🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a quite unique situation: the pioneering US parade of the babysitters. Their qualifications differ in their qualifications and characteristics, but they all have the common objective – to stop an Israeli breach, or even demolition, of Gaza’s unstable peace agreement. After the war concluded, there have been scant occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the ground. Only this past week included the arrival of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and a political figure – all appearing to perform their duties.

Israel occupies their time. In just a few short period it initiated a set of attacks in Gaza after the loss of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, according to reports, in dozens of Palestinian casualties. A number of ministers urged a restart of the conflict, and the Israeli parliament passed a preliminary resolution to incorporate the occupied territories. The American reaction was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in more than one sense, the US leadership seems more focused on preserving the current, uneasy period of the truce than on moving to the next: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Concerning that, it seems the United States may have aspirations but few tangible plans.

At present, it is unclear when the planned international oversight committee will effectively assume control, and the identical goes for the proposed security force – or even the identity of its personnel. On a recent day, a US official declared the United States would not force the structure of the international contingent on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration persists to refuse various proposals – as it acted with the Ankara's suggestion recently – what happens then? There is also the opposite issue: who will determine whether the forces supported by the Israelis are even willing in the task?

The question of the duration it will require to neutralize the militant group is similarly vague. “The expectation in the administration is that the global peacekeeping unit is intends to now assume responsibility in demilitarizing the organization,” remarked Vance lately. “It’s will require some time.” Trump only reinforced the ambiguity, declaring in an conversation a few days ago that there is no “hard” schedule for the group to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unidentified members of this yet-to-be-formed international contingent could enter the territory while the organization's militants still remain in control. Would they be confronting a leadership or a militant faction? These represent only some of the concerns emerging. Others might question what the outcome will be for average Palestinians as things stand, with the group persisting to focus on its own opponents and dissidents.

Latest incidents have once again highlighted the gaps of local reporting on both sides of the Gazan frontier. Each publication strives to analyze all conceivable perspective of Hamas’s violations of the peace. And, usually, the reality that the organization has been hindering the return of the remains of killed Israeli captives has dominated the headlines.

By contrast, attention of non-combatant fatalities in the region stemming from Israeli strikes has garnered minimal notice – if at all. Consider the Israeli response strikes following a recent Rafah occurrence, in which two soldiers were lost. While Gaza’s sources claimed 44 deaths, Israeli news commentators criticised the “moderate answer,” which focused on just installations.

That is nothing new. Over the recent weekend, the press agency accused Israeli forces of infringing the ceasefire with Hamas 47 times after the truce began, killing dozens of individuals and injuring another 143. The allegation seemed unimportant to the majority of Israeli news programmes – it was simply ignored. That included information that 11 members of a Palestinian family were killed by Israeli forces last Friday.

The rescue organization stated the group had been trying to go back to their dwelling in the a Gaza City area of the city when the bus they were in was targeted for reportedly going over the “demarcation line” that marks zones under Israeli army authority. That limit is not visible to the human eye and is visible only on maps and in authoritative records – sometimes not accessible to ordinary residents in the area.

Even this incident barely got a reference in Israeli media. Channel 13 News referred to it shortly on its online platform, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who explained that after a questionable car was spotted, soldiers fired alerting fire towards it, “but the vehicle kept to move toward the forces in a way that created an immediate danger to them. The troops engaged to remove the danger, in compliance with the ceasefire.” No fatalities were reported.

Amid such framing, it is understandable numerous Israelis feel the group solely is to at fault for infringing the peace. This perception could lead to encouraging calls for a tougher strategy in Gaza.

At some point – maybe sooner than expected – it will not be sufficient for American representatives to act as kindergarten teachers, telling Israel what to refrain from. They will {have to|need